Wednesday, September 30, 2020

At first blush, here are my first thoughts about winter 2020-2021.

 

Summer 2020 was very warm and overall, quite dry. But the days are getting shorter, with the sun setting earlier and earlier. We’ve been dealing with cooler temperatures bringing frost/freeze conditions to parts of our region. So, we know lasting cold isn’t all that far away.

 I’ve been fielding more than a few questions, asking what I think the upcoming winter will be like. While it’s too early to go into a lot of detail. I can still go over what some of the indices look like and what they’re implying.

  First, I will go over what NOAA is thinking.

Here are the outlook maps showing both NOAA’s temperature predictions as well as their precipitation predictions for the 2020 – 2021 winter.











NOAA is predicting above-average temperatures this winter across the Mid Atlantic, Pennsylvania, and most of New York State, with well above average temperatures for New England into eastern New York State.

NOAA is predicting even chances for average snowfall this winter across the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Region.

  

What things am I looking at?

 

Patterns such as LA Nina, Quasi Biennial Oscillation (QBO), Sea Surface Temperature (SST) in the northern Pacific and in the western Atlantic, Solar Activity, Snow and Ice Extent, as well as a few other things offer some clues for the winter ahead.

 

Sea Surface Temperature (SST):

Surface

Here is a look at global SST anomalies curtesy of NOAA’s Coral Reef Watch.

 


 




Subsurface

Subsurface temperature anomalies continue to strengthen.  Here are graphics from CPC/NCEP/NOAA, that show the strengthen trend over the last couple of months.


 


 Northeast Pacific Ocean Heatwave:

 The warm SST in the northern especially northeast Pacific, will play a major role in our upcoming winter pattern. The well above average warm spot (Blob) in the Northeast Pacific, south of Alaska and off the Northwest Coast of the CONUS, has pulled west a bit, this will allow for ridging to develop over the western part of North America. The Blob that formed between 2013 and 2016 helped bring about very warm winters.

 




The location of the warm spot should encourage more in the way of a positive Arctic Oscillation (AO)

 

 Teleconnections:

 

El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO):

 


We’re in a La Nina






Looking at the ENSO regions in the equatorial Pacific we can see that all the regions are colder than average.  The warmest region is Nina region 3.4 and region 4. This most likely means this La Nina will be a central based (Modoki). On average we tend to see snowier La Nina’s during weak Modoki years, than we do during a traditional La Nina.  This setup would indicate a predominate trough over the Western CONUS, with more in the way of ridging over the Eastern CONUS, during winter 2020-2021.






Generally during La Nina, the Pacific Jet is more varied.  Here is a look at the typical storm tracks during La Nina.   As far as Nor’easters, La Nina’s tend to see primary lows track out of the southern central Plains through the Great Lakes, with a secondary low developing off the Mid-Atlantic and or New England Coast. 




  

If the La Nina stays weak to moderate, there is still hope of some snow in the Northeast. 

If the La Nina becomes moderate to strong snowfall chances will be dismal.

Here is a look at the general temperature difference between a weak La Nina and a moderate to strong La Nina.





During La Nina we tend to see a stronger and colder Polar Vortex on average. This increases the likelihood of a warmish winter; because a stronger vortex is harder to dislodge which helps keep that arctic air bottled up near the North Pole.

 

Quasi Biennial Oscillation (QBO):

The QBO is an alternating easterly and westerly wind cycle in the lower stratosphere over the equator.  A phase typically last around two years.  

 


The QBO is currently transitioning from an easterly (negative) phase to a westerly (positive) phase; the western trend will continue for winter 2020 -2021. This will increase the odds for a warmer winter in the Northeast.  During a positive QBO we generally see a strong Polar Vortex and lower chances for sudden stratospheric warmings.  The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and the Arctic Oscillation (AO) are much more likely to be generally positive with the QBO is in its westerly phase.  With the NAO and AO likely to be mostly positive it would indicate that high latitude atmospheric blocking in the North Atlantic near Greenland will be harder to achieve.

 


 

The Madden Julian Oscillation (MJO):

The MJO is an oscillation that occurs in the tropics. The MJO propagates eastward, as it moves it augments convection (thunderstorms) and precipitation in parts of the tropics; while at the same time diminishing convection and precipitation in other parts of the tropics.  The MJO phases teleconnect to certain weather patterns over the United States.  

The MJO has primarily been in the Indian Ocean; which is phases 1-3. When in phases 1-3 tropical forcing favorers the East Coast. But the MJO has been trending toward more of a Maritime Continent base state; which is phases 3-6.






Currently the MJO is just outside the NULL (AKA the circle of death) in phase 5. When starting a La Nina we generally don’t see a lot of MJO activity deep into the Pacific.  So, the idea of the MJO not having much amplitude is more or less expected. But as the La Nina peaks during this winter, the MJO should have more amplitude. 

 The MJO most likely will cycle predominately through phases 3,4, and 5 this winter. Typically, these phases don’t support a lot of widespread cold and snowfall across the Eastern U.S. Last winter we saw a good example of what can happen when the MJO stays in the warm phases.

 

Analogies:

The Analog years I’m looking at are: 1839 -1840, 1845-1846, 1852-1853, 1975-1976, 1984-1985 1998-1999, 2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020.

For now, I’ve decided on 1975-1976, 1984-1985, 1998-1999, 2010-2011, 2012-2013, 2017-2018, 2018-2019, 2019-2020.





 The closest matches to the current pattern are 2010-2011 and 2016-2017. Both of these seasons featured a developing La Nina with a westward trending QBO.

   

Northern Hemisphere Arctic Sea Ice and snow extent:

 

Looking at the data from the National Snow and Ice data center. On the ice extent chart, we see we’re at the seasonal minimum. Typically, we see the annual season minimum ice extent mid to last September. On the map, yellow is showing sea ice coverage, white is showing snow cover.





Arctic sea ice is at the second lowest minimum in recorded history.  While Ice extent is lower closer to Russia. There is quite a bit of ice cover over Greenland.  During the summer melt season, northeast and southwest parts of Greenland saw well above average melting compared to the 1981-2010 average, but below the levels seen in many previous summers over the past 10 years. The melt extent over the southeast and northwest is lower than average. 




Eurasian snow cover hasn't changed greatly over the past week with just a few snow patches appearing in the far eastern corner of Siberia and a splattering of snow in northern Canada.  But Siberia is quickly cooling off as it progresses toward its winter pattern. So, I expect to see snowfall ramp up quite a bit over the next 4 weeks.

 

It's really too early to garner a lot of useful data here. But, over the next 4 weeks, snow cover will vastly increase across Eurasia and northern Canada. So, by the end of October, we should see a clearer signal as to how things could go.

 

Solar Activity:

We’re at a solar minimum.

In December of last year, we left solar cycle 24 and are now in solar cycle 25.




The GWV solar activity tracker shows that solar activity is still at very low levels, with no visible sunspots on the solar disc today.




There is a correlation between solar activity and the Polar Vortex. Commonly during a solar minimum and a west based QBO the odds greatly increase that we will see a strong Polar Vortex. With the QBO trending west and the fact we’re in a solar minimum it seems quite likely the PV will be stronger than average.  This would also mean the odds favor a positive AO and NAO which would make it less likely to see a lot of blocking setting up.

 

Tropical Activity:

It is difficult to extrapolate a lot in this category.  We’ve had a lot of named tropical activity, but the Accumulated Cyclone Energy Index has been more or less close to average.  There is a weak correlation between an active Atlantic Hurricane Season and colder and snowier winters along the East Coast.  My take on the discrepancy between the amount of named storms VS ACE, indicates there is an increased chance for warmer temperatures and less snowfall in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic for winter 2020-2021.  But we still have October and November to go through, so there is time for the ACE value to recover. So, there is the hope that we could salvage more of an average winter out of it.  

 

 

Bottom Line:

Generally, this is looking to be a warmer than average winter.   Overall temperatures across the entire Northeast and Mid-Atlantic should run 1°F to 5°F above average the warmest areas look to be the Middle Atlantic, Pennsylvania, much of New York State into Southern New England. Across Northern New York State and Northern New England look to end up slightly above average overall.   

December into early January will have some cold shots. But by Mid-January and most of February it looks to be quite warm.  Then we most likely will cool back off for March.  So, based on how things look right now, the odds favor an overall warmer than average winter here in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic

La Nina winters on average produce less than average amounts of snow. But given the facts I’ve gone over, Snowfall should end up 90% to 75% of average across the entire Northeast and Mid-Atlantic, the farther north you go the better your chance of seeing more in the way of snow.  Winter 2020-2021 has a good chance of seeing more rain and mixing events this year, as compared to average.  

Here are a couple of maps that show my overall Ideas for winter 2020-2021. Remember amounts can vary across different areas depending on storm track and local factors. This is a general overall look ahead.

 





My second installment will be posted end of October. I will make adjustments based on the conditions at that time.

Thursday, September 24, 2020

Is the record setting 2020 Atlantic hurricane season a sign of the apocalypse!

 Sea surface temperatures across the tropical Atlantic are much warmer than average, and vertical wind shear is well below average. So conditions still support the idea of more tropical cyclones yet to come.

Teddy made landfall near Ecum Secum, Nova Scotia , and has become completely extra tropical with winds of 50 mph. Beta is a remnant low. And Paulette’s ghost has been sent the way of Linda Blair. But other than that the tropics are quiet….and most likely will stay that way for the next 7-10 days. So I want to discuss something else………
I read an article by Eric Holthaus titled “ The 2020 Hurricane Season Is a Turning Point in Human History”
Mr Holthaus is a meteorologist and a Climate correspondent. In the article Holthaus claims, due to the record setting pace of naming tropical cyclones in the Atlantic that “ We’ve entered a brand-new, catastrophic era”. He also said “At no point in the 170 years of Atlantic basin weather history have so many strong storms formed so quickly”. Another thing he pointed out was “This hurricane season has been defined by storms forming in strange locations that rapidly intensify and produce unusually heavy rains” He is using all the typically buzz words such as Apocalypse and Terrifying.
I will provide a link to his article at the end of this post, so you can read it, and draw your own conclusions.
The question is Eric Holthaus correct in what he is implying? … Or is he using smoke and mirrors like a David Copperfield magic show?
We’ve seen two tropical cyclones in the Gulf at the same time, We’ve had 9 tropical cyclones make landfall on the CONUS. We had an Medicane in the Mediterranean (A Medicane is a hurricane like storm that forms in the Mediterranean). We’ve seen some very slow-moving tropical cyclones that dropped a lot of rain on local communities. We’ve seen systems getting named in places in the North Atlantic over cold water. And most importantly, we’ve had 23 named storms so far this season, the truth is we’re running about 30 days ahead of an average season in regards to the NHC naming tropical cyclones.
So far it seems Holthaus is right……at least at first blush looking at the surface of the data he presents. There was an important piece of data that was left out of the article, Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE). I’ve explained what ACE is many times… So all I will say is “It’s a metric used to express the energy used by a tropical cyclone during its lifetime. The total ACE of each storm is added up to come up with the seasonal ACE”.
Most people base how active the hurricane season on the number of named storms. While this is OK…it really isn’t the best way to measure how active a season truly is. it really shows us how much tropical energy the atmosphere was able to produce during a hurricane season.
1933 saw the highest total ACE in recorded history, with an ACE of 259. 2005 comes in at Second place, with an ACE of 250.
Global ACE is currently at 62% of normal year-to-date. In an average year, the Pacific makes up the lion share of the ACE. But this year that distinction is being held by the North Atlantic. So, this means the other basins are running way below average to date As of today (September 23) ACE values in the North Atlantic are running about 145% above average for this date. Now that may seem like a lot, but it really is only slightly above average based on the climatical average using the 1980 to 2010 average. On average the ACE index for the Atlantic Basin, ends up right around 104. As of today, the ACE value in the Atlantic is 105.
This data below comes from the CPC and NOAA.
Extremely active season:
An ACE index above 152.5 x 104 kt2 (corresponding to 165% of the 1981-2010 median).
Above-normal season:
An ACE index above 111 x 104 kt2 (corresponding to 120% of the 1981-2010 median), with at least two of the following three conditions: 13 or more named storms, 7 or more hurricanes, and 3 or more major hurricanes.
Below-normal season:
• a) An ACE index below 66 x 104 kt2 (corresponding to less than 71.4% of the 1981-2010 median), or
• b) An ACE index above 71.4% of the median with the following three conditions: 9 or fewer named storms, 4 or fewer hurricanes, 1 or fewer major hurricanes.
Near-normal season: Neither the above- nor below-normal season criteria are met.
A near-normal season will typically have an ACE range of 66-111 x 104 kt2 (corresponding to 71.4%-120% of the 1981-2010 median).
We’ve had a lot of named storms, but not really a lot of activity. Three quarters of the systems this season have been short-lived, very weak one- or two-day wonders. Now I know we have two months left in the Atlantic season. I’ve been saying we’re not done with tropical cyclones this season. I still think the Northeast and or Mid Atlantic will see at least one more tropical impact this season. And IMO the Caribbean is ripe for a major hurricane to develop, from there it could go into the Gulf or along the Eastern Seaboard. But even with that, If we were to remove some of the short-lived, weak and questionably-named systems, our ACE would be 75.9. Which would be right around average for this date. So again IMO, if the next two months were to match what we’ve seen so far, we would most likely still end up slightly above average at the end of the season.
So, based on this, I think Eric Holthaus nose has been growing of late.
I want to point out that, this is all based on statistical analysis, and isn’t any indictor of the potential daily, weekly, or seasonal threats of Atlantic hurricanes and tropical storms for the rest of this season.





Friday, September 4, 2020

Accumulated Cyclone Energy ...is the 2020 Atlantic Hurricane Season really as active as some say?

 

Accumulated Cyclone Energy,  ACE measures the total wind energy realized over the entire life cycle of all storms in a tropical season. ACE is an index that combines the numbers of systems, how long they existed and how intense they became.  The ACE Index is intended to provide better insight into a seasons overall intensity than simply counting the number of storms. On average 76% of a seasons total ACE happens after August, 28. Historically, only two named storms form on average by early August. Based on this, our 2020 season is basically just getting started.






ACE comes to be especially important when trying to compare different hurricane seasons in an effort to show the differences in power used during the seasons. A hurricane season could have an above-average number of storms, but if they were all weak, the season could still score lower than a season that had fewer storms overall but also some major hurricanes.






A paper authored by Carl Drews asserts “The results show that the recent increase in Atlantic hurricane activity is primarily due to an increase in the number of storms per season, with increased hurricane intensity playing a secondary role.”

NOAA uses the ACE index of a season to classify the season into one of four categories. The categories break down as:  below average, near average, above average, and extremely active season and are based on the ACE index, number of tropical storms, hurricanes and major hurricanes over the 30 years between 1981 and 2010.

Atlantic basin

Category

ACE Index

Tropical storms

Average

105.6

12.1

Extremely active

Above 152.5

Not defined

Above-normal

Above 111

13 or more

Near-normal

66-111

10-13

Chart source Wikipedia

 

This year most weather outlets are forecasting the (Atlantic) ACE value to be somewhere between 150 and 200. Numbers that high would qualify 2020 as a hyperactive season.

 2005 and 1995 were very active years in the Tropical Atlantic. 2005 saw 28 named (including an unnamed subtropical storm added during post season analysis). Of the named storms, 15 were hurricanes with 8 of those being major, 4 of those major hurricanes obtained category 5 status: Emily, Katrina, Rita, and Wilma. The 2005 Atlantic hurricane season was the most active Atlantic hurricane season on record going back to 1851. But we have to keep in mind, that before the satellite era, tropical cyclones could have escaped notice. Seven of the named storms made landfall in the United States.

The 1995 Atlantic hurricane season was another hyperactive season with 19 named storms, 11 hurricanes and five major hurricanes: Felix, Luis, Marilyn, Opal and Roxanne.  One thing that really makes 1995 standout is the fact there were 5 named storms in the Atlantic Basin at the same time, Humberto, Iris, Jerry, Karen and Luis.

Based on ACE the 1933 hurricane season was the most intense season in the historic record going back to 1851.     1933 had a total ACE in the North Atlantic of 258.6.  The year in 2nd place based on ACE is 2005 with an ACE of 245.3. 

When looking at the number of named storms, 1933 was the 2nd most active on record. It is estimated to have produced 20 named storms.  As I said before, without Satellite observation, if tropical cyclones stayed out to sea away from populated areas or shipping lanes, especially if they were short duration and relatively weak, could’ve remained undetected. Of the 20 storms during the season, 11 attained hurricane status. 6 of those were major hurricanes. This broke the record for most known named storms set back in 1887. Out of the 6 major hurricanes, 5 of them made landfall on the United States. Two of those major hurricanes made landfall one day apart. The 1933 Hurricane Season was notable in two respects. First, the 21 tropical disturbances recorded that year was a record in the Atlantic (eclipsed in 2005), and second, the majority of storms moved farther west than is usual. Seven of these made landfall between Corpus Christi and Tampico, Mexico






So, the total number of storms isn’t really telling the whole story about 2020. While we’re having a record setting pace for named storms; the ACE is lagging quite a bit.  So far, the total amount of energy produced in the North Atlantic has been 45.1, the vast majority of which consist of Isaias (9.19) and Laura (12.75), the rest is comprised by the rest of the pack, showing how weak and short lived those tropical cyclones were. We still in the peak of the Atlantic season with still half of the season to go. So, there is still plenty of time for total ACE to climb. The potential of more tropical cyclones impacting the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast are still quite high, based on the climatological average.   Just because most of the storms this season have been weak and short lived, doesn’t mean this will be the case for September and October. I don’t believe our region is done with tropical cyclones this season….so keep your guard up…

 

Source Colorado State University